| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
WestSideDaddy MnGCA Board

Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 545
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:49 am Post subject: Why notifications by type |
|
|
OK. I don't get it. Why can you only setup notifications by type (trad, multi, mystery,etc). I just don't understand. I can see making that optional, or letting you select several (like on a PQ) but why only one type for a notification.
Rant over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GeoPierce Geocacher

Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 1657 Location: Eden Prairie, MN
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree. _________________ Tupperware doesn't belong in the kitchen! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manfromwillow Geocacher
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 139
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You can have every type set up, just that you have to do them individually. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GeoPierce Geocacher

Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 1657 Location: Eden Prairie, MN
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manfromwillow wrote: |
| You can have every type set up, just that you have to do them individually. |
Right, I currently have 14 notifications setup so I can be notified when caches are published and archived. And that's just for one zip code! _________________ Tupperware doesn't belong in the kitchen! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JJnTJ Geocacher

Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 218
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Groundspeak has no clue (or interest) in how people actually use their website. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bflentje Geocacher

Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 3655
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JJnTJ wrote: |
| Groundspeak has no clue (or interest) in how people actually use their website. |
I am not sure I agree with this statement. I think they do know. They're too busy coding souvenirs and challenges to worry about a notification system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WestSideDaddy MnGCA Board

Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 545
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bflentje wrote: |
| JJnTJ wrote: |
| Groundspeak has no clue (or interest) in how people actually use their website. |
I am not sure I agree with this statement. I think they do know. They're too busy coding souvenirs and challenges to worry about a notification system. |
Just checking... was that sarcasm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GeoPierce Geocacher

Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 1657 Location: Eden Prairie, MN
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WestSideDaddy wrote: |
| bflentje wrote: |
| JJnTJ wrote: |
| Groundspeak has no clue (or interest) in how people actually use their website. |
I am not sure I agree with this statement. I think they do know. They're too busy coding souvenirs and challenges to worry about a notification system. |
Just checking... was that sarcasm |
I'm pretty sure that was sarcasm. But I agree that it seems like they spend more time adding new features no one cares about than improving existing features that could easily be made better. _________________ Tupperware doesn't belong in the kitchen! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KRedEP Geocacher

Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 713
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GeoPierce wrote: |
I'm pretty sure that was sarcasm. But I agree that it seems like they spend more time adding new features no one cares about than improving existing features that could easily be made better. |
Like a better search. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JJnTJ Geocacher

Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 218
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I made this a while ago:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Red_Devil35 Past MnGCA Board

Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 2889 Location: Practically South Dakota!
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GeoPierce wrote: |
| WestSideDaddy wrote: |
| bflentje wrote: |
| JJnTJ wrote: |
| Groundspeak has no clue (or interest) in how people actually use their website. |
I am not sure I agree with this statement. I think they do know. They're too busy coding souvenirs and challenges to worry about a notification system. |
Just checking... was that sarcasm |
I'm pretty sure that was sarcasm. But I agree that it seems like they spend more time adding new features no one cares about than improving existing features that could easily be made better. |
When I look at the 'newest caches' list, I would really, really like to see the distance from my home. I would think that would be relatively simple to accomplish. _________________ "We never seek things for themselves-what we seek is the very seeking of things"-Pascal |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GeoPierce Geocacher

Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 1657 Location: Eden Prairie, MN
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JJnTJ wrote: |
I made this a while ago:
 |
That explains it perfectly! You should post it on Facebook and tag Jeremy Irish. _________________ Tupperware doesn't belong in the kitchen! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sharknose Bunnies Geocacher

Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 297
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JJnTJ wrote: |
I made this a while ago:
 |
That's crazy stuff. I have no idea what you're talking about.
The new maps are AWESOME. More than 50% of the tiles display properly on the satellite view, and I even had the tile with the cache I was looking for display once.
The iPhone app can display ten caches in LESS THAN 3 MINUTES! Just think how long it would take to print out ten cache pages on paper.
And we said we wanted virtuals brought back, and there you go. Virtuals were brought back. That's responsive!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|