| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Da Bloodhound Geocacher

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 78
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:14 am Post subject: GSAK to filter multi user PQ? |
|
|
Just wondering if anyone out there knows if a common PQ can be run through consecutive gsak filters to make a common list of caches for a group.
In other words, can I run a PQ that eliminates any finds in the PQ area then send that to a fellow cacher to filter out his previous finds in the area and so on. The hope is that after everyone in the group has cleared their finds the remaining PQ would hold common unfound caches for all involved. The last one to filter the list could then redistribute that list and everyone would be on the same page of unfound caches.
I have GSAK but don't know if this is an available feature.
Thanks for any help you may be able to share.
DaBloodhound |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jam3s Geocacher

Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 842
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is a macro called groupcaching or groupcaching2. I have not done it myself, but it does not sound hard. _________________ ~~ I was told all I needed was a GPS. I wanted everything else. ~~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pfalstad Geocacher

Joined: 02 Feb 2006
Posts: 967 Location: Edina
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:12 am Post subject: Re: GSAK to filter multi user PQ? |
|
|
What I usually do is have everybody send me their "My Finds" PQ. Then I load one of the PQ's using the "Set user flag", "If matched, ONLY update user flag", and "Clear all user flags first" boxes checked. Then I load the other PQ's using the same boxes checked except for "Clear all user flags first". Now if I set a filter to look only at my unfound caches with the user flag clear, those caches are unfound by everyone.
Now this might work, I haven't tried it: have everybody do the same PQ and send it to you. Then clear all user flags and load one of the PQ's, and then set the user flag for all found caches (use a filter to select only found caches and then User Flags->Set for Filter Only). Do the same for all the other PQ's including yours. Then filter on caches with the user flag unset. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GeoPierce Geocacher

Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 1657 Location: Eden Prairie, MN
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use GPSBabel (which is what gsak uses behind the scenes) and I happened to see this yesterday but I've never tried it: http://www.gpsbabel.org/tips/geocaching.html
| Code: |
We have a group hunt planned this weekend and would like to hunt only caches that none of us have found.
gpsbabel -i gpx -f yourarea.gpx -i gpx -f myfinds.gpx -i gpx -f myfinds.gpx -i gpx -f hisfinds.gpx -i gpx -f hisfinds.gpx -i gpx -f herfinds.gpx -i gpx -f herfinds.gpx -x duplicate,shortname,all -o gpx -F todolist.gpx
Translation: Start with a PQ of the entire area. Merge the 'found' cache lists from each cacher on the hunt. Discard anything that appears on the list more than once. Obviously, if the PQs aren't for exactly the same area/cache type, additional filtering may be needed. |
_________________ Tupperware doesn't belong in the kitchen! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BananaForce Geocacher

Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 72 Location: Minneapolis
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bflentje Geocacher

Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 3673
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd just let each cacher worry about his own PQ.. ok, I was being smart. Blame Karen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonas Past MnGCA Board
Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 672 Location: Chaska, MN
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:19 am Post subject: Re: GSAK to filter multi user PQ? |
|
|
| Da Bloodhound wrote: |
| In other words, can I run a PQ that eliminates any finds in the PQ area then send that to a fellow cacher to filter out his previous finds in the area and so on. |
If you received a copy of those other cachers "all finds" gpx and import it into you GSAK database, then you can filter out caches that you and they have found. The GSAK help topic "Log Filter Examples" or "Filter: Log examples" shows how to do this.
-Jonas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pear Head Past MnGCA President

Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 5600 Location: north of Duluth
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:29 pm Post subject: Re: GSAK to filter multi user PQ? |
|
|
| pfalstad wrote: |
| What I usually do is have everybody send me their "My Finds" PQ. Then I load one of the PQ's using the "Set user flag", "If matched, ONLY update user flag", and "Clear all user flags first" boxes checked. Then I load the other PQ's using the same boxes checked except for "Clear all user flags first". Now if I set a filter to look only at my unfound caches with the user flag clear, those caches are unfound by everyone. |
This is also what I do and it works well. _________________ Hmm... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrest Geocacher

Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 386 Location: Western 'burbs
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use GSAK for this in the set filter, in the logs tab, run a "log" filter:
Logs to search "all"
include/exclude "exclude"
logged by "enter cacher name or id number" if using name it has to be exact, so I use id number.
Then run any other filters i.e. specific diff / terr , distance, cache types, cache sizes, what ever you want to hunt up... export to gps, or mapsoure or what ever, and email that gpx file to the other cachers and you should have only unfound caches for all on the list and be good to go...
Have fun _________________ round n' round we go! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pear Head Past MnGCA President

Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 5600 Location: north of Duluth
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jrest wrote: |
I use GSAK for this in the set filter, in the logs tab, run a "log" filter:
Logs to search "all"
include/exclude "exclude"
logged by "enter cacher name or id number" if using name it has to be exact, so I use id number.
Then run any other filters i.e. specific diff / terr , distance, cache types, cache sizes, what ever you want to hunt up... export to gps, or mapsoure or what ever, and email that gpx file to the other cachers and you should have only unfound caches for all on the list and be good to go...
Have fun |
When you pull a PQ it only pulls the last 4 (or is it 5?) logs from a cache. If the cache was hit with more logs than that since the last time you pulled the PQ then you'll miss out on some of the logs (for example, if WNC hits a cache then you'll miss some of the logs from that). _________________ Hmm... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonas Past MnGCA Board
Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 672 Location: Chaska, MN
|
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pear Head wrote: |
| When you pull a PQ it only pulls the last 4 (or is it 5?) logs from a cache. If the cache was hit with more logs than that since the last time you pulled the PQ then you'll miss out on some of the logs (for example, if WNC hits a cache then you'll miss some of the logs from that). |
That still works, granted that you get the "all finds" gpx from the people you want to filter on as it would contain all their find logs.
-Jonas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Da Bloodhound Geocacher

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 78
|
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 7:15 am Post subject: group PQ |
|
|
THANKS everyone for all the data and ideas.
I'll give this a go for next weekend and see how it all works out.
See ya down the trail
DB  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pear Head Past MnGCA President

Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 5600 Location: north of Duluth
|
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jonas wrote: |
| Pear Head wrote: |
| When you pull a PQ it only pulls the last 4 (or is it 5?) logs from a cache. If the cache was hit with more logs than that since the last time you pulled the PQ then you'll miss out on some of the logs (for example, if WNC hits a cache then you'll miss some of the logs from that). |
That still works, granted that you get the "all finds" gpx from the people you want to filter on as it would contain all their find logs.
-Jonas |
Yes. I guess my point was that no matter how you do it you need everyone's 'my finds' query as the regular PQs don't necessarily provide all of the required information. _________________ Hmm... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|