| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
badwolf22 Geocacher
Joined: 17 Oct 2010
Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 4:48 pm Post subject: earth-cache permission in Minneapolis Parks |
|
|
I was wondering if anyone has a contact in the Minneapolis park system. I am working on an earthcache located in a Minneapolis park and just need to find a contact to get permission. I did send a message to all of the owners of earthcaches in Minneapolis parks and only two got back to me. The COs do not remember who they contacted for permission. They told me it was someone in the Parks Department.
Any name would be greatly appreciated. The Minneapolis Parks Department is large so am just looking for a specific person that might be able to give me the answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
andrewmcc Past MnGCA Board

Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 985
|
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I may be wrong but I don't think you need city permission to do an earthcache. _________________ Dinnae fash yersel (don't worry yourself) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kc9gbo Geocacher
Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 148
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The city may not require it, but GeoAware does for them to publish Earthcaches now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
speedysk1 Past MnGCA Board

Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Posts: 1991 Location: Mound MN
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kc9gbo wrote: |
| The city may not require it, but GeoAware does for them to publish Earthcaches now. |
That's dumb. If I can visit the site, since it's on public property, then permission should not be needed. Do we need to ask permission to walk on the trails now before a cache can be published? Sheesh. _________________ Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KRedEP Geocacher

Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 721
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| speedysk1 wrote: |
| kc9gbo wrote: |
| The city may not require it, but GeoAware does for them to publish Earthcaches now. |
That's dumb. If I can visit the site, since it's on public property, then permission should not be needed. Do we need to ask permission to walk on the trails now before a cache can be published? Sheesh. |
+1 I also don't understand. There is no container. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bflentje Geocacher

Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 3673
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kc9gbo wrote: |
| The city may not require it, but GeoAware does for them to publish Earthcaches now. |
Actually, I believe Geoaware takes any established geocaching policy in place of actual permission. Does Minneapolis have an established policy? I don't recall one way or the other. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pear Head Past MnGCA President

Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 5600 Location: north of Duluth
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bflentje wrote: |
| Does Minneapolis have an established policy? |
Not that I'm aware. _________________ Hmm... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ArcherDragoon Geocacher

Joined: 02 Nov 2007
Posts: 925 Location: Southeastern Minnesota
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
You need a name and contact info for someone. I have worked with Rochester City Parks for a couple I have down here. It is required regardless of policy by Geoaware and the group that works with Earthcaches.
Edit: To be clear...the regardless part is in reference to local policy...Geoaware requires that info for any Earthcache regardless of location... _________________ You may only be young once...but I will be immature forever!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNMizzou Geocacher

Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 641 Location: Maple Grove, MN
|
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They do realize that 99% of these are on open park land? The only difference between me and a class of 3rd graders stopping to read a plaque in a park is I'm the only adult who will have read it since it was last found by a cacher... the third graders will probably be quizzed on it later.
I can understand if it is in some sort of private facility, which I'm not even sure why you would put one in someone's house... but this getting permission thing is getting a little nuts, what do you tell them? "Hi, I need permission for people to come and read a plaque in the park?" That should go over well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
King Boreas Geocacher

Joined: 16 Dec 2002
Posts: 2352 Location: Exploring Minnesota
|
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| this getting permission thing is getting a little nuts |
Rock on ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guitar Solo Geocacher

Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 165
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Who REALLY cares if I was to walk to a park, write some stuff down, and take a picture of a rock?! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timewellspent Geocacher

Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 665 Location: Chanhassen, MN
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ArcherDragoon wrote: |
| Edit: To be clear...the regardless part is in reference to local policy...Geoaware requires that info for any Earthcache regardless of location... |
So Geoaware should already have this contact info since there are EC's in Minneapolis Parks correct? Just ask this reviewer who the other CO's contacted for permission so you may contact them as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pear Head Past MnGCA President

Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 5600 Location: north of Duluth
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| timewellspent wrote: |
| So Geoaware should already have this contact info |
I would be pretty surprised if a reviewer that reviews Earthcaches across the entire US (plus some?) would have the contact info from a cache that he reviewed quite some time ago.. _________________ Hmm... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
speedysk1 Past MnGCA Board

Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Posts: 1991 Location: Mound MN
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe Fruitcake can investigate this a bit and see why this is required or ask Geoaware to respond here? I agree with MNMizzou. As long as anyone else can be at that location permission is not required. It's one thing to ask for permission to leave a cache container, it's something entirely different to have someone read a public plague and take a picture. I'd be very interested to understand the reasoning for this. _________________ Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pear Head Past MnGCA President

Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 5600 Location: north of Duluth
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| speedysk1 wrote: |
| Maybe Fruitcake can investigate this a bit and see why this is required or ask Geoaware to respond here? I agree with MNMizzou. As long as anyone else can be at that location permission is not required. It's one thing to ask for permission to leave a cache container, it's something entirely different to have someone read a public plague and take a picture. I'd be very interested to understand the reasoning for this. |
I looked it up on the FAQ:
http://www.geosociety.org/earthcache/faq.htm
2nd to the last question in this case. _________________ Hmm... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|