| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rosebud55112 Geocacher
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 89
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 10:21 am Post subject: So what's the deal with the names? |
|
|
I've noticed that recently a lot of people have hidden caches with the names of elements from the periodic table on it. Many of these new caches link back to Boreal Walker's Periodic Table of Elements Challenge, the object of which is to find caches containing all the elements' names.
I don't understand the purpose of this--of naming caches a particular way just so that another hider's challenge becomes easier for other cachers to complete. Sometimes, the name comes naturally- such as the caches in the Ramsey area hidden on or near streets named after some of the elements. Those, I get. But a cache named in such a way just so it will help fulfill a challenge? That sort of cheapens the challenge in my eyes.
I own one challenge based on cache names. I don't think anyone has (or had to) name a cache to meet my challenge, but I'd be a little upset if that happened. I won't be planting anymore caches based on names, for a couple of reasons.
I should say, I am working on some challenges based on cache names, and some are more open than others. And while, for example, I'd be pleased if there were a multicache starting with 'X' near me, I'd rather have have "Xeriscape" lead me through an area of drought-resistant plants than have "XRAY" be a simple walk through the woods with no connection to the name.
Even though "The Reviled Devil's Trail of Evil Hides: From Roseville to Lakeville via Lake Demontreville" might get me a lot closer to qualifying for GC2CGY0, I think that it would be cheap. And I say that even though I have some "Roseville", "Lakeville", and "Platteville" caches on my qualifying list.
Maybe I'm getting frustrated on BW's behalf, and he doesn't mind, or even encourages this. It just seems odd that lately there has been such a concerted push in this area, by a multitude of cache hiders, that I have to say " What's the deal with the names?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bflentje Geocacher

Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 3649
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Boreal Walker has a Periodic Table of the Elements Challenge. I suspect it's related to that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bflentje Geocacher

Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 3649
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:10 am Post subject: Re: So what's the deal with the names? |
|
|
| rosebud55112 wrote: |
| I've noticed that recently a lot of people have Maybe I'm getting frustrated on BW's behalf, and he doesn't mind, or even encourages this. It just seems odd that lately there has been such a concerted push in this area, by a multitude of cache hiders, that I have to say " What's the deal with the names?" |
Ah, I didn't read all the way down before replying. I can't speak for BW, but for me, they're just caches. I've been grabbing the elemental caches on my outstate road cruises but not going out of my way. Too some degree, I am challenged out. I did the higher profile ones and now only grab challenge required caches if I happen to be near them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
qwerty2582 Past MnGCA Board
Joined: 03 Apr 2009
Posts: 457
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| For me (I hid a couple in Red Wing), I simply didn't have a good idea for a cache name, and wanted to do a little something to help with the Boreal Walker challenge... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrest Geocacher

Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 386 Location: Western 'burbs
|
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
For me, I was hiding them before that challenge came out, and was just something I was interested in. Chemistry. Found a cool website that put up video's of some interesting experiments or things that were of interest related to that particular element.
Still having fun with that. _________________ round n' round we go! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ArcherDragoon Geocacher

Joined: 02 Nov 2007
Posts: 921 Location: Southeastern Minnesota
|
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jrest wrote: |
For me, I was hiding them before that challenge came out, and was just something I was interested in. Chemistry. Found a cool website that put up video's of some interesting experiments or things that were of interest related to that particular element.
Still having fun with that. |
Same here...I had a couple chem puzzles created...just never got to actually submitting them...I really like the names and have been wanting to use them...has little to do with the challenge...but, I don't mind helping...and I know Boreal appreciates the assist...just part of the fun with caching. _________________ You may only be young once...but I will be immature forever!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dornole Geocacher
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 352
|
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's sort of hard to imagine how, say, strontium would ever naturally occur in a cache name? Do you have to find them ALL? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|